Self-Serve tier

Parse evaluation completion date and parental request date → IDEA §1414(d) IEP meeting timeline analysis. Computes 30-day IEP meeting deadline from initial evaluation completion. Flags procedural safeguard deadlines, PWN requirements, and compensatory education exposure. Self-con

Compute IDEA due process complaint timeline under 34 CFR §300.508-512: 2-year statute of limitations, 10-day LEA response, 30-day resolution meeting period, 45-day hearing decision deadline. Surfaces complaint sufficiency requirements, resolution session waivers, and party-of-int

Apply IDEA evaluation, three-year reevaluation, and Independent Educational Evaluation (IEE) framework under 34 CFR §300.301-303 + §300.502. Computes 60-school-day initial evaluation deadline from parental consent, three-year reevaluation cycle, and IEE-at-public-expense rights w

Apply Extended School Year (ESY) eligibility analysis under 34 CFR §300.106 using the regression-recoupment standard. Determines whether student requires ESY services to receive FAPE, surfaces the prohibition on single-criterion eligibility tests, and identifies state-specific ES

Apply Endrew F. v. Douglas County 580 US 386 (2017) FAPE progress standard to IEP adequacy review under IDEA 20 USC §1412(a)(1). Surfaces the "reasonably calculated to enable a child to make progress appropriate in light of the child's circumstances" test. Replaces obsolete pre-E

Audit IEP for the eight required content elements under 34 CFR §300.320 and verify Prior Written Notice compliance under 34 CFR §300.503. Identifies missing PLAAFP, measurable goals, services description, LRE statement, transition plan, accommodations, progress reporting, and sta

Apply Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) analysis under 20 USC §1412(a)(5) + 34 CFR §300.114-117 + Sacramento City Unified Sch. Dist. v. Rachel H., 14 F.3d 1398 (9th Cir. 1994). Walks four-factor Rachel H. test for inclusion vs separate placement. Surfaces the continuum-of-alter

Apply 34 CFR §300.530(e) manifestation determination review (MDR) framework when a school proposes a disciplinary change of placement for a student with an IEP. Computes the 10-school-day MDR meeting deadline, the two-question MDR test (caused by / direct and substantial relation

Apply Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools 598 US 142 (2023) IDEA exhaustion analysis. When ADA / §504 plaintiff seeks compensatory damages unavailable under IDEA, exhaustion under 20 USC §1415(l) is not required. Pairs with Fry v. Napoleon 580 US 154 (2017) gravamen test. Self-contai

Apply Burlington-Carter unilateral private placement reimbursement framework under 20 USC §1412(a)(10)(C) + Florence County Sch. Dist. v. Carter 510 US 7 (1993) + Sch. Comm. of Burlington v. Mass. Dep't of Educ. 471 US 359 (1985). Surfaces three-prong reimbursement test, 10-busin

Audit Procedural Safeguards Notice and Prior Written Notice (PWN) compliance under 34 CFR §300.504 + §300.503. Verifies the once-per-year + on-request Procedural Safeguards Notice obligation and the seven-element PWN content requirement. Procedural failures are independently acti

Compare Section 504 (29 USC §794 + 34 CFR Part 104) and IDEA (20 USC §1400 et seq. + 34 CFR Part 300) eligibility, scope, procedural protections, and remedies. Identifies when each framework applies, dual eligibility, and Fry v. Napoleon 580 US 154 (2017) gravamen test for ADA /

Apply IDEA stay-put / pendency rule under 20 USC §1415(j) + Honig v. Doe 484 US 305 (1988). Identifies the "current educational placement" maintained during pendency of due process or judicial proceedings, the dangerousness exception requiring district to seek injunction, and the