skil
.
ski
Skills
SkiPaks
SkiLodge
Pricing
Enterprise
About
Search 200+ Skilskis…
⌘K
Engage
$99/mo
my skills
sign in
1,247
/min
200K
verified
0.91
avg gauntlet
$4.2M
moved (24h)
synced 2s ago
Filters
Filters
Close
tier / self_serve
Self-Serve tier
Skilskis priced $1,200 - $5,000.
search this view...
Search
⌘K
paste a finding / SOP
Paste finding / SOP
✓✓
Operator-Verified only
Verified only
12 of 1,467 verified flagships
+ federated tools →
│
election
×
Self-Serve
×
gpt
×
clear
skilski-election · v.static
Distinguish 501(c)(4) issue advocacy from express advocacy and electioneering communications under Buckley v. Valeo (1976) magic words and FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life II, 551 U.S. 449 (2007) functional equivalent test. Apply IRC §501(c)(4) primary purpose limit and §527 spillo
Skilski Election Law Pro 501c4 Issue Advocacy Vs Express Advocacy
election
·
saves up to $12K
Distinguish 501(c)(4) issue advocacy from express advocacy and electioneering communications under Buckley v. Valeo (1976) magic words and FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life II, 551 U.S. 449 (2007) functional equivalent test. Apply IRC §501(c)(4) primary purpose limit and §527 spillo
candidate
Pro
included w/ Pro
✦ SkilSki Original
$99
$50
/pro
skilski-election · v.static
Apply the Buckley v. Valeo (1976) doctrinal split between contribution limits (closely drawn scrutiny, sustained) and expenditure limits (strict scrutiny, struck) to evaluate the constitutionality and statutory classification of a proposed federal/state political finance regulati
Skilski Election Law Pro Buckley V Valeo 1976 Spending Vs Contribution Distinction
election
·
saves up to $12K
Apply the Buckley v. Valeo (1976) doctrinal split between contribution limits (closely drawn scrutiny, sustained) and expenditure limits (strict scrutiny, struck) to evaluate the constitutionality and statutory classification of a proposed federal/state political finance regulati
candidate
Pro
included w/ Pro
✦ SkilSki Original
$99
$50
/pro
skilski-election · v.static
Apply Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010) to evaluate whether a corporation, union, or 501(c)(4) may make a proposed independent expenditure or electioneering communication, classify the speech, separate independence from coordination, and identify disclosure obligations
Skilski Election Law Pro Citizens United 2010 Corporate Independent Expenditure
election
·
saves up to $12K
Apply Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010) to evaluate whether a corporation, union, or 501(c)(4) may make a proposed independent expenditure or electioneering communication, classify the speech, separate independence from coordination, and identify disclosure obligations
candidate
Pro
included w/ Pro
✦ SkilSki Original
$99
$50
/pro
skilski-election · v.static
Apply the FEC three-prong coordinated communication test of 11 C.F.R. §109.21 (payment, content standard, conduct standard) to a proposed advertisement, mailer, or digital placement. Identify whether speech is independent or coordinated, triggering reclassification as an in-kind
Skilski Election Law Pro Coordination Rule 11 Cfr 109 21 Content Standard
election
·
saves up to $12K
Apply the FEC three-prong coordinated communication test of 11 C.F.R. §109.21 (payment, content standard, conduct standard) to a proposed advertisement, mailer, or digital placement. Identify whether speech is independent or coordinated, triggering reclassification as an in-kind
candidate
Pro
included w/ Pro
✦ SkilSki Original
$99
$50
/pro
skilski-election · v.static
Prepare and submit a Federal Election Commission Advisory Opinion request under 52 U.S.C. §30108 (formerly 2 U.S.C. §437f), establishing requestor standing, specific transaction or activity, applicable statutory and regulatory framework, and good-faith reliance protection under §
Skilski Election Law Pro Fec Advisory Opinion Process 2 Usc 437f
election
Pro
✦ SkilSki Original
$50
skilski-election · v.static
Compute Federal Election Campaign Act individual contribution limits per 52 U.S.C. §30116, applying current FEC indexed amounts, candidate-committee/PAC/party tier separation, election-cycle bifurcation (primary vs general), and aggregate limit rules post-McCutcheon. Surfaces exc
Skilski Election Law Pro Feca 52 Usc 30101 Contribution Limits Individual
election
Pro
✦ SkilSki Original
$50
skilski-election · v.static
Apply the foreign-national contribution and expenditure prohibition under 52 U.S.C. §30121 and Bluman v. FEC, 800 F. Supp. 2d 281 (D.D.C. 2011), aff'd 565 U.S. 1104 (2012). Identify covered foreign nationals, exempt lawful permanent residents, decision-making attribution to U.S.
Skilski Election Law Pro Foreign National Prohibition 52 Usc 30121 Bluman
election
Pro
✦ SkilSki Original
$50
skilski-election · v.static
Apply McCutcheon v. FEC, 572 U.S. 185 (2014) to confirm post-McCutcheon contribution-limit topology; verify that no biennial aggregate cap applies and that per-recipient base limits remain. Surface joint fundraising committee, transfer, and earmarking risks that re-aggregate by a
Skilski Election Law Pro Mccutcheon Aggregate Limits 2014 1st Amendment
election
Pro
✦ SkilSki Original
$50
skilski-election · v.static
Apply the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA / "Motor Voter") at 52 U.S.C. §§20501-20511 to a state implementation question — DMV registration integration, public-assistance agency obligations, mail registration, list maintenance program, and 90-day pre-election freeze on syst
Skilski Election Law Pro Nvra Motor Voter 52 Usc 20501 State Implementation
election
Pro
✦ SkilSki Original
$50
skilski-election · v.static
Apply the Anderson-Burdick balancing test from Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.S. 780 (1983) and Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U.S. 428 (1992) to evaluate constitutionality of state ballot-access requirements (signature thresholds, filing fees, deadlines, party-test rules) under the Firs
Skilski Election Law Pro State Ballot Access Anderson Burdick Balancing
election
Pro
✦ SkilSki Original
$50
skilski-election · v.static
Form, qualify, and operate an independent-expenditure-only political committee (Super PAC) under SpeechNow.org v. FEC, 599 F.3d 686 (D.C. Cir. 2010) and FEC Advisory Opinions 2010-09 and 2010-11. Establish unlimited individual/corporate/union receipts, statement of organization,
Skilski Election Law Pro Super Pac Independent Expenditure Only Committee
election
Pro
✦ SkilSki Original
$50
skilski-election · v.static
Apply Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 52 U.S.C. §10301, under Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1986) preconditions and the totality-of-circumstances analysis, as reaffirmed by Allen v. Milligan, 599 U.S. 1 (2023). Evaluate vote-dilution claims for redistricting plans and at
Skilski Election Law Pro Voting Rights Act Section 2 Allen V Milligan 2023
election
Pro
✦ SkilSki Original
$50
Built 1467+. Need #1468?
We'll build it →